Last Wednesday, on the same page as the small snippet of my interview, Log Montreal Metro proposed a story: Strike belly to save the planet.
is the media, they have to be sensational to sell it, but I think the beginning of the article describing a Denatale madman who kills people too do not serve the "cause" if I may say so. We will all take us for madmen ...
That said, I want to specify that many childfree are not Denatale or antinatalist or even Malthusian. But just ... What is the difference?
In my view, a childfree person is someone who does not want a child for personal reasons. (This does not prevent him from power as being anti-birth Denatale or more.)
Well, to date, it's simple ... it gets harder from the other 3 terms. Two are synonymous and the third would be a bad translation?
In Quebec, less is known about Thomas Malthus in Europe. It was a British economist who advocated Denatale before its time, or in the early nineteenth century. That is to say Denatale.
Denatale:
Someone who advocates the population decline, which found that not only the planet suffers from an overflow of people, but it should do less by environmental concerns and economic. Several left-wing politicians in the world are beginning to demand Denatale.
Someone who devalues the contribution moral to have children and find that with less, we would solve many problems on this planet with hunger, overcrowding and declining natural resources. It's not just the same as Denatale that?
My interpretation is that the Malthusian Denatale advocate and a population decline for reasons economic or environmental ... and the term anti-birth would be a layer of English and meant the same as the previous two. But maybe I was wrong too ...
short, although I also think that too many of us on this planet, I do not cite this reason as that explains Why I do not want kids. For me, this is one reason satellite. True, that I say it loud and clear: I do not care just not. End of story.
I'm childfree and proud of it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment